Ambiguous Query Expansion

The Problem

Short or ambiguous queries get expanded incorrectly, leading to irrelevant retrievals or missing the user's actual intent.

Symptoms

  • ❌ Query "API" retrieves too broadly

  • ❌ Ambiguous term interpreted wrong

  • ❌ Over-expansion adds noise

  • ❌ Cannot disambiguate intent

  • ❌ Retrieves multiple unrelated topics

Real-World Example

Query: "Python"

Could mean:
→ Python programming language (tech docs)
→ Python the snake (if you have wildlife content)
→ Monty Python (if you have entertainment content)

Retrieval returns:
→ Mix of all interpretations
→ Mostly irrelevant for user's actual intent
→ AI confused by mixed context

Deep Technical Analysis

Ambiguity Types

Polysemy:

Short Queries:

Contextual Disambiguation

Conversation History:

User Profile/Role:

Query Clarification

Ask Back:

Suggest Intent:

Controlled Expansion

Domain-Specific Expansion:

Relevance Feedback:


How to Solve

Use conversation context to disambiguate queries + implement query clarification (ask user to specify) + apply role/domain-based interpretation + controlled vocabulary expansion (domain-specific) + require minimum query length (e.g., 3+ words) + use intent classification before retrieval + implement relevance feedback loop. See Ambiguous Queries.

Last updated